|
|
|
APOLLO FAKE
How Michael. J. Tuttle faked the Apollo Moon
pictures.
___________________________________________________
This
web page will reveal how Michael J Tuttle manipulated, (doctored),
pictures from the so called Apollo training simulations, then posted them
on NASA web sites as being genuine pictures taken on the Apollo Moon
missions. I regularly get e-mail from PAN's claiming that digital
manipulation of photo's was not available back in 1969. Sheesh. People
have been creating fake photographs ever since the camera was invented,
and who is saying the pictures were taken back in 69 anyway? PAN's cannot
seem to get it into their pea sized brains the fact that THE MAJORITY OF
NASA's FAKE MOON PICTURES WERE CREATED IN THE MID 90's. Ninety five
percent of NASA's fake Moon pictures on their web site WERE NEVER SEEN
PRIOR TO THE LAUNCH OF THE INTERNET. They had to produce a considerable
number of fake Moon pics, otherwise the public would want to know why
there were so few. I would also like to point out to the PAN's that NOT
ALL fake Moon pictures were digitally manipulated. The controversial
picture of Aldrin has not been digitally tampered with, and there were a
number of pictures taken in the fake Moonscape scene at Langley, which did
not require any alteration to pass it off as a Moon
picture. The
task was handed to Michael J.
Tuttle in 1994, and here is how he did it using
early versions of Adode Photo shop. ![]() This
beach photograph was taken from Tuttle's web site. Let's do some PIXEL
TRICKS manipulation with the image, using Photoshop, and the same tactics
as Tuttle to make a fake Moon
picture. ![]() First
turn the image into an 8 bit
grayscale. ![]() Next
black the sky using spray or paint
infill. ![]() We now
reverse the orientation of
image. ![]() By now
you should get where I am coming from, and where I'm going too. If that
person with hand glider were not in the pic, and the ruffled sand were
smoothed out a bit, you would have a TYPICAL NASA FAKE MOON PICTURE. All
you need to do is paste your astroNOT where you want him. The few blades
of grass can easily be erased, its just that I do not need to go the whole
hog to get my point across. Notice
total absence of tire tracks directly behind the Moon buggy rear wheel.
The Moon buggy and it's shadow have been pasted onto photograph, OR if
buggy was genuinely in the picture, it's been placed/lowered there by some
crane. The two
pictures below are from a NASA web site. It shows how the images were
altered from the original scene. The picture left appears to have a dark
sunset at top section, whilst the picture on right shows differing
textures between sky line, foreground and pasted mountains. Now before
idiotic PAN's begin e-mailing me suggesting I doctored the photo's, I will
repeat. THE PICTURES ARE FROM A NASA ARCHIVE SITE.
Incidentally Tuttle has owned up to digitally altering photographs for
NASA, (see APOLLOFEEDBACK). For years PAN's,
and NASA, have denied the Moon photo's were fake. Now the truth is out
NASA may as well admit defeat. The game is definitely up.
![]() ![]() Come
along Mr. Tuttle you know full well what appears here is the
truth. You also created the 360
degree landing site FAKE shots. Hundreds of questions have been put to NASA regarding the
alleged Moon photographs, and not once have they replied with a logical
explanation. One of those questions was:- "Why are some Moon photographs
in color, whilst others are in monochrome?" According to NASA no expense
was spared with Apollo, so why the difference, why aren't ALL the
photographs in color? The
answer to that question is quite simple. A few color photographs were
taken during the Apollo 11 to Apollo 17 period. Those photographs were for
publicity/press coverage. However in later years, when the Internet came
into existence, the public wanted to see more photographs from those
Apollo missions, and of course none were available. NASA therefore
instructed Tuttle to "conjure up" some authentic looking Moon pictures.
Using the method shown above, it was easier to compose a picture in 8 bit
grayscale, and in any case if Tuttle left the original colors, in the
picture, it would be obvious the surface was nothing more than sand. In
the fake Apollo 14 shot with Shepherd holding the flag, the surface is
sandy colored, simply BECAUSE IT IS SAND. That is why Moon boot footprints
show up so well. APOLLO
REALITY
How, and where NASA faked the lunar
orbiting/landing, and lift off video's. APOLLO
INSIDER
Detailed info on how NASA faked the astronaut video Moon
scenes. APOLLO
DATA
Data from the Apollo missions which does not add
up. APOLLO
TRUTH
The reason NASA faked the Apollo Moon
missions. APOLLOSCAM
More ridiculous Moon pics with added
humor. APOLLO
LAUGH
You've just gotta take the Mickey. APOLLO
FEEDBACK
Read what the media say about naughty
NASA. APOLLO
FACTS
Facts to be considered about Apollo Moon
missions. NASASCAM
Start you investigation
here. All sites best viewed at 1280 X 768, or 1280 X
1024 resolution with medium text size.
|
||
bravenet.com