APOLLO FAKE

How Michael. J. Tuttle faked the Apollo Moon pictures.

___________________________________________________

This web page will reveal how Michael J Tuttle manipulated, (doctored), pictures from the so called Apollo training simulations, then posted them on NASA web sites as being genuine pictures taken on the Apollo Moon missions. I regularly get e-mail from PAN's claiming that digital manipulation of photo's was not available back in 1969. Sheesh. People have been creating fake photographs ever since the camera was invented, and who is saying the pictures were taken back in 69 anyway? PAN's cannot seem to get it into their pea sized brains the fact that THE MAJORITY OF NASA's FAKE MOON PICTURES WERE CREATED IN THE MID 90's. Ninety five percent of NASA's fake Moon pictures on their web site WERE NEVER SEEN PRIOR TO THE LAUNCH OF THE INTERNET. They had to produce a considerable number of fake Moon pics, otherwise the public would want to know why there were so few. I would also like to point out to the PAN's that NOT ALL fake Moon pictures were digitally manipulated. The controversial picture of Aldrin has not been digitally tampered with, and there were a number of pictures taken in the fake Moonscape scene at Langley, which did not require any alteration to pass it off as a Moon picture.

The task was handed to Michael J. Tuttle in 1994, and here is how he did it using early versions of Adode Photo shop.

This beach photograph was taken from Tuttle's web site. Let's do some PIXEL TRICKS manipulation with the image, using Photoshop, and the same tactics as Tuttle to make a fake Moon picture.

First turn the image into an 8 bit grayscale.

Next black the sky using spray or paint infill.

We now reverse the orientation of image.

By now you should get where I am coming from, and where I'm going too. If that person with hand glider were not in the pic, and the ruffled sand were smoothed out a bit, you would have a TYPICAL NASA FAKE MOON PICTURE. All you need to do is paste your astroNOT where you want him. The few blades of grass can easily be erased, its just that I do not need to go the whole hog to get my point across.

Notice total absence of tire tracks directly behind the Moon buggy rear wheel. The Moon buggy and it's shadow have been pasted onto photograph, OR if buggy was genuinely in the picture, it's been placed/lowered there by some crane.

The two pictures below are from a NASA web site. It shows how the images were altered from the original scene. The picture left appears to have a dark sunset at top section, whilst the picture on right shows differing textures between sky line, foreground and pasted mountains. Now before idiotic PAN's begin e-mailing me suggesting I doctored the photo's, I will repeat. THE PICTURES ARE FROM A NASA ARCHIVE SITE. Incidentally Tuttle has owned up to digitally altering photographs for NASA, (see APOLLOFEEDBACK). For years PAN's, and NASA, have denied the Moon photo's were fake. Now the truth is out NASA may as well admit defeat. The game is definitely up.

Come along Mr. Tuttle you know full well what appears here is the truth. You also created the 360 degree landing site FAKE shots.

Hundreds of questions have been put to NASA regarding the alleged Moon photographs, and not once have they replied with a logical explanation. One of those questions was:- "Why are some Moon photographs in color, whilst others are in monochrome?" According to NASA no expense was spared with Apollo, so why the difference, why aren't ALL the photographs in color?

The answer to that question is quite simple. A few color photographs were taken during the Apollo 11 to Apollo 17 period. Those photographs were for publicity/press coverage. However in later years, when the Internet came into existence, the public wanted to see more photographs from those Apollo missions, and of course none were available. NASA therefore instructed Tuttle to "conjure up" some authentic looking Moon pictures. Using the method shown above, it was easier to compose a picture in 8 bit grayscale, and in any case if Tuttle left the original colors, in the picture, it would be obvious the surface was nothing more than sand. In the fake Apollo 14 shot with Shepherd holding the flag, the surface is sandy colored, simply BECAUSE IT IS SAND. That is why Moon boot footprints show up so well.

APOLLO FRY UP How deadly space radiation makes Moon trip impossible.

APOLLO REALITY How, and where NASA faked the lunar orbiting/landing, and lift off video's.

APOLLO INSIDER Detailed info on how NASA faked the astronaut video Moon scenes.

APOLLO DATA Data from the Apollo missions which does not add up.

APOLLO TRUTH The reason NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.

APOLLOSCAM More ridiculous Moon pics with added humor.

APOLLO LAUGH You've just gotta take the Mickey.

APOLLO FEEDBACK Read what the media say about naughty NASA.

APOLLO FACTS Facts to be considered about Apollo Moon missions.

NASASCAM Start you investigation here.

All sites best viewed at 1280 X 768, or 1280 X 1024 resolution with medium text size.


	APOLLO FAKE How Michael. J. Tuttle faked the Apollo Moon pictures. ___________________________________________________ This web page will reveal how Michael J Tuttle manipulated, (doctored), pictures from the so called Apollo training simulations, then posted them on NASA web sites as being genuine pictures taken on the Apollo Moon missions. I regularly get e-mail from PAN's claiming that digital manipulation of photo's was not available back in 1969. Sheesh. People have been creating fake photographs ever since the camera was invented, and who is saying the pictures were taken back in 69 anyway? PAN's cannot seem to get it into their pea sized brains the fact that THE MAJORITY OF NASA's FAKE MOON PICTURES WERE CREATED IN THE MID 90's. Ninety five percent of NASA's fake Moon pictures on their web site WERE NEVER SEEN PRIOR TO THE LAUNCH OF THE INTERNET. They had to produce a considerable number of fake Moon pics, otherwise the public would want to know why there were so few. I would also like to point out to the PAN's that NOT ALL fake Moon pictures were digitally manipulated. The controversial picture of Aldrin has not been digitally tampered with, and there were a number of pictures taken in the fake Moonscape scene at Langley, which did not require any alteration to pass it off as a Moon picture. The task was handed to Michael J. Tuttle in 1994, and here is how he did it using early versions of Adode Photo shop. This beach photograph was taken from Tuttle's web site. Let's do some PIXEL TRICKS manipulation with the image, using Photoshop, and the same tactics as Tuttle to make a fake Moon picture. First turn the image into an 8 bit grayscale. Next black the sky using spray or paint infill. We now reverse the orientation of image. By now you should get where I am coming from, and where I'm going too. If that person with hand glider were not in the pic, and the ruffled sand were smoothed out a bit, you would have a TYPICAL NASA FAKE MOON PICTURE. All you need to do is paste your astroNOT where you want him. The few blades of grass can easily be erased, its just that I do not need to go the whole hog to get my point across. Notice total absence of tire tracks directly behind the Moon buggy rear wheel. The Moon buggy and it's shadow have been pasted onto photograph, OR if buggy was genuinely in the picture, it's been placed/lowered there by some crane. The two pictures below are from a NASA web site. It shows how the images were altered from the original scene. The picture left appears to have a dark sunset at top section, whilst the picture on right shows differing textures between sky line, foreground and pasted mountains. Now before idiotic PAN's begin e-mailing me suggesting I doctored the photo's, I will repeat. THE PICTURES ARE FROM A NASA ARCHIVE SITE. Incidentally Tuttle has owned up to digitally altering photographs for NASA, (see APOLLOFEEDBACK). For years PAN's, and NASA, have denied the Moon photo's were fake. Now the truth is out NASA may as well admit defeat. The game is definitely up. Come along Mr. Tuttle you know full well what appears here is the truth. You also created the 360 degree landing site FAKE shots. Hundreds of questions have been put to NASA regarding the alleged Moon photographs, and not once have they replied with a logical explanation. One of those questions was:- "Why are some Moon photographs in color, whilst others are in monochrome?" According to NASA no expense was spared with Apollo, so why the difference, why aren't ALL the photographs in color? The answer to that question is quite simple. A few color photographs were taken during the Apollo 11 to Apollo 17 period. Those photographs were for publicity/press coverage. However in later years, when the Internet came into existence, the public wanted to see more photographs from those Apollo missions, and of course none were available. NASA therefore instructed Tuttle to "conjure up" some authentic looking Moon pictures. Using the method shown above, it was easier to compose a picture in 8 bit grayscale, and in any case if Tuttle left the original colors, in the picture, it would be obvious the surface was nothing more than sand. In the fake Apollo 14 shot with Shepherd holding the flag, the surface is sandy colored, simply BECAUSE IT IS SAND. That is why Moon boot footprints show up so well. APOLLO FRY UP How deadly space radiation makes Moon trip impossible. APOLLO REALITY How, and where NASA faked the lunar orbiting/landing, and lift off video's. APOLLO INSIDER Detailed info on how NASA faked the astronaut video Moon scenes. APOLLO DATA Data from the Apollo missions which does not add up. APOLLO TRUTH The reason NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions. APOLLOSCAM More ridiculous Moon pics with added humor. APOLLO LAUGH You've just gotta take the Mickey. APOLLO FEEDBACK Read what the media say about naughty NASA. APOLLO FACTS Facts to be considered about Apollo Moon missions. NASASCAM Start you investigation here. All sites best viewed at 1280 X 768, or 1280 X 1024 resolution with medium text size. nasascam@yahoo.com